International ANSWER’s slogan is “Act Now to Stop War and End Racism.” Like most activist mission statements, their claim has been proven false many times. That doesn’t stop them from repeating it.
Their claim to be ‘anti-war’ was most notably when their connection to the World Worker’s Party and to the supporters of Kim Jong Il was exposed.
ANSWER/WWP’s supporters, and their history, including their “love affair with Slobodan Milosevic” and their description of reports of Serb atrocities against Muslims as “imperialist lies.” caused a split within the anti-war movement. On December 12th United For Peace and Justice, announced their decision “not to coordinate work with ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War & End Racism) again on a national level.”
According to Lennie Brenner’s Jan. 2006 article, published in NYC indemedia and Counterpunch, titled: The War Within the Antiwar Movement: Not Dealing with Zionism is Like a King Kong Movie Without the Ape:
[United for Peace and Justice's] national committee complained that ANSWER reneged on the organizations’ plan for structuring the demo. But beyond proclaiming that “the souring of the political atmosphere is largely due to ANSWER, which, in our experience, consistently substitutes labels (‘racist,’ ‘anti-unity’) and mischaracterization of others’ views for substantive political debate or problem solving,” UFPJ gave us nothing substantial re the coalitions’ political differences.
In the article, Leslie Cagan, UFPJ’s national coordinator, receives the harshest of criticism – implications that her “political differences” with ANSWER are a form of collaboration:
“Leslie is dedicated to peace. But if she is to retain her reputation, she must be able to justify UFPJ’s position, now, when she knows that the Israeli ambassador is happy because it refuses to work with ANSWER.”
Brenner notes that both ANSWER and United for Peace and Justice are both silent on the issue of Saudi Arabia:
I’ve asked Leslie if UFPJ has a position on US money & weapons to Saudi Arabia: “Perhaps we need to develop one?” ANSWER also doesn’t say much about Saudia. Now high oil prices, awareness that it was Al-Qaeda’s breeding ground, & total subjugation of women, make it the most unpopular US ally. Muslims bow 5 times a day in the direction of Mecca. But Wall Street bows once a second towards Saudi Arabia. The antiwar movement should get those wonderful April photos of Bush & Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah holding hands at the Texas ranch & put them up everywhere. The 3 classic goals for progressives are get the people mobilized, organized & educated. Wars, exploitation, oppression make folks begin to think & we can mobilize some in the streets. But the antiwar split proves that we haven’t gotten our act together organizationally. The reason? Precisely because neither UFPJ or ANSWER is into serious education.
ANSWER may not be into serious education about Saudi Arabia because apparently they’re receiving some serious Saudi money.
Saudi donations to the Stalinist Left follow an old path, through terrorism’s financial center, the group the Christian Science monitor calls “a popular social and political group that wants rule by Islamic law” – the Muslim Brotherhood.
According to International Assessment and Strategy Center’s report: The Little Explored Offshore Empire of the International Muslim Brotherhood
Almost from the inception of the modern Islamic banking structure (early 1980s), the international Muslim Brotherhood set up a parallel and far-flung offshore structure that has become an integral part of its ability to hide and move money around the world. This network is little understood and has, so far, garnered little attention from the intelligence and law enforcement communities tracking terrorist financial structures.
The fundamental premise of the Brotherhood in setting up this structure was that it is necessary to build a clandestine structure that was hidden from non-Muslims and even Muslims who do not share the Brotherhood’s fundamental objective of recreating the Islamic caliphate and spreading Islam, by force and persuasion, across the globe…
…In 2003 Richard Clarke said “the issue of terrorist financing in the United States is a fundamental example of the shared infrastructure levered by Hamas, Islamic Jihad and al Qaeda, all of which enjoy a significant degree of cooperation and coordination within our borders. The common link here is the extremist Muslim Brotherhood—all these organizations are descendants of the membership and ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood.”[5] However, this understanding has not taken root in the intelligence, law enforcement and policy communities, nor has the financial network of the Brotherhood come under intense scrutiny.
Public records show the Brotherhood’s financial network of holding companies, subsidiaries, shell banks and real financial institutions stretches to Panama, Liberia, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Switzerland, Cyprus, Nigeria, Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and beyond. Many of the entities are in the names of individuals who, like Nada, Nasreddin, al-Qaradawi and Himmat, have publicly identified themselves as Brotherhood leaders.
A senior U.S. government official estimates the total assets of the international Brotherhood to be between $5 billion and $10 billion.
Although they are apparently ‘stateless’, terrorism’s military and support structure is similar to any other army. The armed, trained soldiers are one branch, the political spokesmen and leaders are another branch and the financial supporters are another branch. All are part of the same organization, and all are working together to wage war.
According to this Department of Treasury Report:
Bank Al Taqwa, for which Nasreddin is a director, was established in 1988 with significant
backing from the Muslim Brotherhood. They have been involved in financing radical groups
such as the Palestinian Hamas, Algeria’s Islamic Salvation Front and Armed Islamic Group,
Tunisia’s An-Nahda, and Usama bin Laden and his Al Qaida organization. Bank Al Taqwa was
established in the Bahamas and is a close affiliate of the Al Taqwa Management Organization,
which changed its name in the spring of 2000 to the Nada Management Organization. In 1997, it
was reported that the $60 million collected annually for Hamas was moved to Bank Al Taqwa
accounts. As of October 2000, Bank Al Taqwa appeared to be providing a clandestine line of
credit to a close associate of Usama bin Laden and as of late September 2001, Usama bin Laden
and his Al Qaida organization received financial assistance from Youssef M. Nada
The Muslim Brotherhood’s front in the United States is called The Muslim American Society (MAS).
The Muslim Brotherhood-led and Saudi-financed activities:
…effect a wide range of affairs, from daily minutia to public policy. Consider these examples:
• On June 6, 2006, a Minnesota Muslim American Society (MAS) fatwa ordered Muslim drivers at the Minneapolis-St. Paul airport not to transport passengers carrying alcohol, to avoid “cooperating in sin.” Most Muslim drivers there originate from Somalia, where carrying alcohol in a bag was never a problem. But by August 2006, some 77 passengers per month, carrying duty-free bags containing sealed alcoholic drinks were refused by Muslim cab drivers complying with the MAS fatwa. At first, Minnesota’s Metropolitan Airports Commission considered their demands and offered two-tier taxi system; one for alcohol carriers and a second for the others. Only public outrage forced the Commission to kill their proposal…
The Muslim Brotherhood/Muslim American Society calls itself “a charitable, religious, social, cultural, and educational, not-for-profit organization..a pioneering Islamic organization, an Islamic revival, and reform movement that uplifts the individual, family, and society.”
Given their mission statement, and given their supposed support of Muslim groups, including the Muslims in Bosnia, their reaction to United for Peace and Justice’s rift with ANSWER is odd:
(Washington, DC) – Over one hundred prominent Muslim leaders and National organizations have indicated that there is only one rally and march in Washington, DC, on September 24. And it will not be the “Segregation” March proposed by United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ). Responding to what has been categorized as a patronizing elitist and separation agenda that has long been a divisive issue in the anti-war and peace movement, prominent leaders in the Muslim and Arab community made it clear that they will not allow groups like the United for Peace and Justice set the agenda for American Muslim involvement in the peace movement. Thus the idea that UFPJ will attempt to hold a separate March and Rally on September 24 in Washington, DC, and not join in principle the September 24 National Coalition for the March on Washington is viewed by many as a “segregationist counter-rally”. Why? The answer is simple. It is all about having a principle position on Palestine. When it is all said and done UFPJ has paid mere lip service to the Palestine issue and struggle as being part and parcel of the American Peace Movement. They have ignored the insistence of authentic voices in the Muslim and Arab community that ending the occupation of Palestine and other regions of the world should not be decoupled from ending the occupation in Iraq.
Mahdi Bray, Executive Director, MAS Freedom Foundation stated, “The days when a few elitists with a few surrogate persons of color can stymie the hope and aspirations of millions of American Muslims concerning a principle agenda and response to what takes place in the Muslim world is over. Let’s get real here, UFPJ called for a segregated March in DC after the A.N.S.W.E.R Coalition made the initial call. They listed all kinds of excuses why they can’t join a unity effort.
Not coincidentally, Mahdi Bray’s MAS Freedom Foundation, has been working very closely with ANSWER for years. The Muslim Brotherhood’s English language site, ikhwan.tv, proudly describes one of these co-sponsored marches:
The National Emergency March on Washington is co-sponsored by the A.N.S.W.E.R. (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) Coalition and the National
Council of Arab Americans (NCA).Your support is vital! Send your generous donations today addressed
to:MAS FREEDOM FOUNDATION
1050 17th Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: “For every day the sun rises, (God grants a reward to) the one who establishes justice among people.” Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 3, Hadith 870.
ANSWER, (“Act Now to Stop War and End Racism.”), which is financed by one of the most racist regimes in the Middle East, has another petrodollar-funded ‘anti-war’ march scheduled for March 17th. They’ll be marching with the Muslim Brotherhood’s corporate-petrodollar-funded “not-for-profit organization”, the Muslim American society. They’ll be working together to “challenge the system that is addicted to war and global domination!”, to free Mumia, help the poor and to “reform and uplift the individual, family, and society.”
They’ll also reconfirm the fact that for many ‘anti-war’ organizations Orwell’s 1984 was a how-to guide. Lies are truth, the Arab war against Israel is peace…
..oh, and no blood for oil!
February 10, 2007 at 10:55 pm
ANSWER may not be into serious eductation …
Whoops. Bad word to misspell. :)
February 10, 2007 at 11:00 pm
Maybe I missed it, but where is the Saudi funding of ANSWER documented?
Also, why would they provide funds to ANSWER? It’s neither effective or popular. Besides, they have the Bush Whitehouse on their side. Why fund a bunch of irrelevant fringe leftists?
February 10, 2007 at 11:43 pm
Bad word to misspell. :)
Thanks.
Maybe I missed it, but where is the Saudi funding of ANSWER documented?
The Muslim Brotherhood/MAS manages Saudi terror funds, and they use that money to fund ANSWER’s ‘peace’ rallies.
Why fund a bunch of irrelevant fringe leftists?
They’re ‘anti-Zionist’ leftists.
February 11, 2007 at 12:03 am
They’re ‘anti-Zionist’ leftists.
So? When they have the President of the USA holding hands with their leaders and the President’s father flying to Saudi Arabia to hobnob with the aristocracy, I don’t understand the need to “fund” fringe leftists, anti-Zionist or not.
Besides, a peace rally doesn’t require much funding. If you want to see more insidious and effective funding, you might check the clients of companies like Qorvis Communications. They do better work than a bunch of smelly Marxists in the street.
February 11, 2007 at 9:44 am
I don’t understand the need to “fund” fringe leftists, anti-Zionist or not.
I assume that they fund these anti-Zionist rallies for the same reason they give Jimmy Carter millions – they’re hedging their bets.
But I don’t think like a Saud, so this is just a guess. I don’t know why they fund the Left as well as the right. I just know that they do fund the Left as well as the right.
When evaluating an organization, their criminal activity is more significant than their mission statement. The MAS and the Muslim Brotherhood fund terrorism. That’s a crime. So why does ANSWER take the money?
Besides, a peace rally doesn’t require much funding.
I know plenty of ‘peace’ marchers, I get random e-mails from them talking about ‘free’ bus rides to the rally in Washington, the ‘free’ signs. Those large scale rallies cost a lot.
February 11, 2007 at 10:12 am
I know plenty of ‘peace’ marchers, I get random e-mails from them talking about ‘free’ bus rides to the rally in Washington, the ‘free’ signs. Those large scale rallies cost a lot.
Because leasing a bus and getting placards printed costs a lot? Are these high-priced items in your area?
February 11, 2007 at 10:12 am
I know plenty of ‘peace’ marchers, I get random e-mails from them talking about ‘free’ bus rides to the rally in Washington, the ‘free’ signs. Those large scale rallies cost a lot.
Because leasing a bus and getting placards printed costs a lot? Are these high-priced items in your area?
February 11, 2007 at 11:09 am
Because leasing a bus and getting placards printed costs a lot?
Leasing busses and getting placards printed for 500,000 people costs a lot. Transporting and catering to speakers like Jane Fonda and Jesse Jackson probably costs even more.
In any case, people like Ramsey Clark and Lynne Stewart aren’t “smelly Marxists in the street”. They’re extremely wealthy, powerful people who are protecting their interests, and who are visibly more equal than the ‘poor’ they pretend to support.
..and that blind sheik who got Ms. Stewart into so much trouble. I think he was with the Muslim brotherhood.
An organization’s criminal record is more important than their propaganda. The Muslim brotherhood and the Left have been working together for years.
February 11, 2007 at 11:40 am
I think you may be both overestimating the cost of a demonstration and the effect that people like Clarke have on society.
February 11, 2007 at 12:49 pm
Also, as ANSWER wants a US withdrawal from Iraq and Saudi Arabia is opposed to a withdrawal, I’m not sure what the logic is there.
I think this theory could use some work.
February 11, 2007 at 1:49 pm
I think this theory could use some work.
it’s a fact that the Muslim brotherhood manages Saudi donations in offshore accounts. According to the treasury department, they manage terrorism’s billion-dollar financial infrastructure.
The Muslim brotherhood/MAS also finances ANSWER’s ‘peace’ marches. That’s not a theory. Why they’re doing it is anyone’s guess.
February 11, 2007 at 2:23 pm
Let’s see. We’ve got Saudi Arabia in the background pulling the strings and providing the funding to the Muslim Brotherhood. Then we have the connection to MAS. Then we have MAS co-sponsoring a march with ANSWER back in August.
Pretty tenuous as far as Saudi Arabia sponsoring ANSWER, don’t you think? Like I said, this theory needs work.
February 11, 2007 at 3:03 pm
Then we have MAS co-sponsoring a march with ANSWER back in August.
If you look at the ANSWER site, you’ll see that MAS’s Freedom Foundation co-sponsors the majority of ANSWER’s marches, including the upcoming one next month (the March march)
The Muslim Brotherhood finances al Qaeda and ANSWER. That’s the most interesting connection.
February 11, 2007 at 4:02 pm
If you look at the ANSWER site..
Aw geez, no thanks. I’ll take your word for it. But I think that if Saudi Arabian money is helping fund ANSWER demonstrations (and that’s tenuous, in my view), then it’s a big waste of money.
February 12, 2007 at 5:57 am
Not to defend to Saudi regime, but I would like to point out a couple of things;
1- Regardless of their policy, some of the wealth of oil money is bound to trickle down to some of the princes pet projects. Now it happens to be fundamentalist causes, but I do not think that there is a concerted effort there. Even lowly Saudi princes could easily go through 100,000 USD in a week, with little to show for the expense. In this context, funds can easily “leak out” from the Saudis over the years, and fund terror projects. There needs not be a master plan of any kind.
2- Saudi Arabia is not a “racist” state. It is family ruled private corporation, with the trappings of a kindgom, which uses its version of religion to maintain its hold over power. call it a family theocracy…
February 12, 2007 at 8:58 am
But I think that if Saudi Arabian money is helping fund ANSWER demonstrations (and that’s tenuous, in my view), then it’s a big waste of money.
Now it happens to be fundamentalist causes, but I do not think that there is a concerted effort there.
Oh heck. I wanted to focus on the fact that the Muslim brotherhood/MAS finances al Qaeda, Hamas and the ‘peace’ movement. The Sauds are contributing the funds, but it seems that their financial management, the Muslim Brotherhood, is directing the flow.
The Saudi involvement was only interesting because of the irony – Leftists claim to be opposed to corporate, big-oil interests, and here they are, using big-oil to finance their marches.
The press portrays the Muslim brotherhood as a “popular social and political group that wants rule by Islamic law”. They believe MB claims to have renounced violence, and they ignore the MB’s job managing offshore accounts. The wildly wealthy ‘brothers’ are the masters of terrorism’s financial universe, yet they’re portrayed as honest, hardworking ideologues.
The press also pretends that these ‘peace’ marches are all about peace, yet they’re financed by they same sources that finance Hamas and al Qaeda.
That should have been the focus. I should change some things before putting it up on Dean’s world..
February 12, 2007 at 9:05 am
Saudi Arabia is not a “racist” state. It is family ruled private corporation, with the trappings of a kindgom, which uses its version of religion to maintain its hold over power. call it a family theocracy…
They’re theocratic, but the official and unofficial treatment of guestworkers and most non-Wahhabis could be defined as racism:
From an article that was probably written by one of the 2 or 3 liberals in Saudi Arabia, Why Is There So Much Hate Inside Us?
“In the shop next to my house, there is a home delivery service which is run by an Indian. He is a good man, hardworking and devoted to his job. I talk to him whenever he delivers something to my house and he talks to me about the time he spent working in Abu Dhabi and of his dream to live in London.”
“Last week I asked him to deliver a newspaper to my house. When he delivered it to me, he asked me whether I wrote in it. I told him that I did and he asked me to write about why young Saudis hate foreign workers, particularly Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. He asked, “Why do they throw rocks at us when they see us in the street?” He said that in India they were taught to love others because that is the teaching of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). I was moved by his words and promised him that I would write on the subject.”
“I took his question to my students and started a discussion in class. The students agreed that they had harassed foreigners, particularly South Asians, in the street. One said that seeing a worker in the street was a perfect chance for them to beat him up and then run away. Some admitted searching for foreign workers to beat up, throw eggs at and generally abuse. I asked my students why they behaved in this way, what was the reason. Some said it was just fun, nothing more or less. Some said it was because those people were weak and unable to fight back. Some said that their favorite pastime was to catch cats, kill them and skin them. I was shocked and disturbed by all this violence and wondered what was causing it…”
February 12, 2007 at 3:10 pm
“Some said that their favorite pastime was to catch cats, kill them and skin them. ”
Great. The classic red flag for a future serial killer.
February 12, 2007 at 6:58 pm
Mary,
I was pointing out, indirectly, that it is far worse. So let me drop the “Lebanese speak” and use more “American speak”.
There are 2 aspects to this “racism”; a more visible religious aspect, and an underlying “race” aspect, which gives the problem a unique pungency.
An example of the race aspect, many Arabs still use the world “3abd” (slave) or “zinj” (k…, or n…) to describe black people, and few resort to using “aswad” (black)… It is an enduring paradox, since the first imam and martyr of Islam was a black companionn of the prophet, and the bravest Arab warrior was black himself (his name, “3antar” became the Arab word for “brave”).
February 12, 2007 at 6:59 pm
Mary,
The observed behavior among Saudi youths by the professor probably isn’t limited to just Saudi Arabia. I would bet that it is prevalent across most of the Middle East.
The attitude that they are displaying towards foreign workers isn’t exact hatred. It’s more along the lines of contempt. But even if one hold others in contempt, one wouldn’t go about harrasing others for sport. Likewise, one wouldn’t go about catching cats and killing them for sport.
My guess is that the Arab youths either have nothing better to do – which might be true since they are living in the middle of the desert – or they need to reinforce their sense of superiority – which might be true especially based on all the reasons the students gave. Either way Saudi Arabia needs to improve the culture that their youths grow up. They need much better things to do that tormenting immigrant workers.
February 13, 2007 at 1:12 pm
The classic red flag for a future serial killer
It is. That and “some said it was because those people were weak and unable to fight back.” say a lot about Saudi society.
Either way Saudi Arabia needs to improve the culture that their youths grow up
This culture is their tradition. In 1921, Winston Churchill said:
“The Wahabis profess a life of exceeding austerity, and what they practise themselves they rigorously enforce on others. They hold it as an article of duty, as well as of faith, to kill all who do not share their opinions and to make slaves of their wives and children. Women have been put to death in Wahabi villages for simply appearing in the streets. It is a penal offence to wear a silk garment. Men have been killed for smoking a cigarette, and as for the crime of alcohol, the most energetic supporter of the temperance cause in this country falls far behind them. Austere, intolerant, well-armed, and bloodthirsty, in their own regions the Wahabis are a distinct factor which must be taken into account, and they have been, and still are, very dangerous to the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, and to the whole institution of the pilgrimage, in which our Indian fellow-subjects are so deeply concerned.”
February 13, 2007 at 1:18 pm
I was pointing out, indirectly, that it is far worse. So let me drop the “Lebanese speak” and use more “American speak”
oops – I thought you were already in American speak. Some Americans believe that the Saudi regime can be a moderating force, an opposition to the more extreme ‘Wahhabis’. I misread that.
February 13, 2007 at 2:03 pm
“This culture is their tradition…’The Wahabis profess a life of exceeding austerity.’”
This just proves my point that you are ignoring the Saudis’ diversity. Saudis austere? Luxury-loving is more accurate. Hypocritical too. Austere is only perhaps true of the Wahhabi preachers, or Osama bin Laden.
March 29, 2007 at 11:14 am
Hi this is vijay
I have gone through this site. I told him that I did and he asked me to write about why young Saudis hate foreign workers, particularly Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. He asked, “Why do they throw rocks at us when they see us in the street. Our site is also related to this for more information follow this link………united first financial